Reasoning Faith

Reasoning Faith

Did You Know?

Jude 1:3: "Beloved, although I was very eager to write to you about our common salvation, I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints."

The Sanctity of Human Life

The Sanctity of Human Life: God’s Design for Life, Love, and Marriage

“For You formed my inward parts; You knit me together in my mother’s womb. I praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.”Psalm 139:13–14 (AMP)
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you.”Jeremiah 1:5 (AMP)

1. The Sacredness of Life in a Confused World

In an age where human identity and morality are increasingly self-defined, the Christian conviction of the sanctity of human life stands as both a moral anchor and a declaration of divine truth. Scripture teaches that every life—from the moment of conception to natural death—is sacred, intentional, and valuable in the eyes of God.

Yet the modern world rejects this truth, replacing divine order with personal autonomy. This worldview affects how society views not only the unborn but also gender, sexuality, marriage, and aging. To deny God as Creator is to dismantle the sacredness of His creation.

The Sanctity of Human Life affirms that every person bears the Imago Dei (Image of God) and therefore possesses inherent worth that cannot be diminished by condition, age, ability, or desire. Life is not an accident—it is a divine masterpiece.

2. The Biblical Foundation of Human Life

A. God as the Author of Life

Psalm 139:13–16 portrays the intimate craftsmanship of God in forming each life in the womb. Every heartbeat is the echo of divine design. Life is sacred because it originates from the Creator Himself.

Jeremiah 1:5 reveals God’s foreknowledge and purpose—He knew us before our birth and ordained us with calling and worth. No person, regardless of background, is outside of His creative intention.

B. The Image of God in Humanity

Genesis 1:27 declares that humankind was made “in the image of God.” This divine image makes human life distinct from all other creation. The Imago Dei confers dignity, moral responsibility, and eternal value upon every human being.

Therefore, whether unborn, disabled, elderly, or marginalized, every life reflects the Creator’s glory. Destroying life—through abortion, euthanasia, or moral disregard—is an assault not only on humanity but on God Himself.

3. The Moral Logic: Why Life and Marriage Are Intertwined

A. The Moral Structure of Creation

God’s design for human flourishing begins with the creation of male and female (Genesis 1:27) and the institution of marriage (Genesis 2:24). The complementarity of man and woman is not arbitrary—it reflects divine purpose and unity.

As Augustine observed, “From the beginning of the human race, marriage was instituted by God as between one man and one woman.”
Marriage, therefore, is more than a social contract—it is a covenant that mirrors the relationship between Christ and His Church (Ephesians 5:25–32).

B. Logical Implications

If life is sacred because God made it, then sexual ethics must also be sacred because God designed it to protect life.
To separate sexuality from covenantal love is to misuse the gift God gave for relational and generational flourishing.

  • Premise 1: God created human beings in His image and gave them the gift of sexuality for procreation and intimacy.
  • Premise 2: Marriage, by divine design, is the covenantal context for this union.
  • Conclusion: Redefining marriage or gender identity undermines the moral framework that upholds the sanctity of life.

4. The Liberal View and Its Contradictions

A. Redefinition of Love and Freedom

The modern liberal view asserts: “Love is love—marriage should be available to any two consenting adults.”
It also promotes gender as a fluid, self-defined construct. The logic is that freedom means autonomy from divine design.

However, this worldview commits several philosophical and moral errors:

  1. Category Error: Love is not self-defining. God is love (1 John 4:8), therefore love must reflect His nature—holy, covenantal, and life-giving.
  2. Contradiction: It celebrates diversity yet demands conformity to an ideology that denies God’s created distinctions (male/female).
  3. False Freedom: Redefining moral boundaries in the name of freedom leads to bondage—emotional, physical, and spiritual (Romans 6:16).

B. Biblical and Historical Christian Response

The Biblical View of marriage and sexuality is not rooted in repression but in redemption. God’s design for marriage points to the Gospel itself—Christ’s sacrificial love for His Church (Ephesians 5:25).
To distort this design is to distort the very image of God’s covenant love.

The Church Fathers, such as Augustine and Chrysostom, viewed marriage as sacred because it symbolized the mystery of Christ and His Bride. The union of male and female in covenant reflects divine complementarity—truth and grace, justice and mercy, Creator and creation.

Thus, “God’s design for marriage is not about restriction but flourishing.” It establishes security, identity, and fruitfulness that flow from obedience to divine order.

5. Logical and Apologetic Defense

A. The Moral Law Argument

C.S. Lewis argued that moral truth exists because it reflects God’s character. Every society recognizes the value of life and fidelity—because these are written on the human heart (Romans 2:15).
To redefine life, marriage, or gender is to erase the moral lawgiver behind these principles.

B. The Inconsistency of Relativism

If truth and identity are self-defined, there can be no moral standard for justice, equality, or dignity.
The same worldview that defends abortion on the grounds of “choice” contradicts itself when it claims to uphold “human rights.” Rights only exist if life itself has an objective, God-given value.

C. The Cultural Consequences

When society detaches life and marriage from divine design, the result is confusion, instability, and loss of meaning:

  • Abortion devalues human existence.
  • Gender fluidity confuses identity.
  • Redefining marriage destabilizes family structure.
  • Euthanasia denies God’s sovereignty over life and death.

The moral decay of culture always begins with the rejection of God’s authority over creation.

6. Practical Application: Living Out the Sanctity of Life

A. In the Home

Parents are called to model Christ-centered homes where love, discipline, and truth are lived out. Children learn the sanctity of life by watching parents honor one another in covenant love.

B. In the Church

The Church must remain both convictional and compassionate—defending biblical truth while extending grace to those who struggle with confusion or guilt.
To speak the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15) is not hate; it is hope.

C. In Society

Christians should advocate for policies that protect life, promote family, and affirm biological reality as God’s creation. Education, law, and healthcare must return to a theology of dignity—not ideology of autonomy.

7. The Wisdom Checklist

Does my view align with God’s design?
Am I building a Christ-centered home?
Do I show Christ’s love to those who disagree?
Do I defend life from conception to natural death?
Do I live out compassion without compromise?

8. Life Is Sacred Because God Is Holy

The sanctity of human life is not merely a moral stance—it is a worship statement. To defend life is to affirm God’s sovereignty. To uphold marriage and gender as He designed is to declare that His ways lead to human flourishing.

In a world obsessed with self-definition, Christians must proclaim that identity begins in creation and is fulfilled in redemption. From conception to natural death, every life tells a story authored by God—a story worth defending.

“For You formed my inward parts; You knit me together in my mother’s womb. I praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.”
Psalm 139:13–14

References

  • The Holy Bible, Amplified Version (AMP).
  • Augustine. The City of God. New York: Modern Library, 1950.
  • C.S. Lewis. Mere Christianity. New York: HarperOne, 2001.
  • Piper, John. This Momentary Marriage. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2009.
  • Schaeffer, Francis A. Whatever Happened to the Human Race? Old Tappan, NJ: Revell, 1979.
  • Henry, Carl F. H. The Uneasy Conscience of Modern Fundamentalism. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1947.
  • Voddie Baucham Jr. Fault Lines: The Social Justice Movement and Evangelicalism’s Looming Catastrophe. Washington, D.C.: Salem Books, 2021.
  • Wilberforce, William. A Practical View of the Prevailing Religious System of Professed Christians. London: T. Cadell, 1797.
  • John Stott. Issues Facing Christians Today. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2014.

Related Post

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI): A Biblical and ...

Is Christianity Rational?

Big Idea: Biblical faith is reasonable, rooted in evide...

Freedom, Faith, and Firearms: A Christian Ana...

Contents Introduction: Faith, Freedom, and Responsi...